Here's an article about a car that was stolen in my neighborhood. Yes, just down the street from me. We were just coming back from dropping ShootingKid off at the airport and we saw the incident as the police were on the scene.
It's funny how the writer of this story mentions the thief had a gun and pointed it at the victim, but the writer neglects to mention the fact the victim got his rifle and held the perp at gun point until the police arrived. Is that simply a missed fact or intentional omission as to not give good guys with guns a A+? either way, it's bad journalism.